<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GPU Processing In Flash Player 10 Can Make Your Content Slower</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pixelfumes.com/index.php?feed=rss2&#038;p=213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pixelfumes.com/?p=213</link>
	<description>The Pixelfumes Flash Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:19:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tony mooney</title>
		<link>http://blog.pixelfumes.com/?p=213&#038;cpage=1#comment-11217</link>
		<dc:creator>tony mooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 16:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pixelfumes.com/?p=213#comment-11217</guid>
		<description>yea i have the latest one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea i have the latest one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.pixelfumes.com/?p=213&#038;cpage=1#comment-11215</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pixelfumes.com/?p=213#comment-11215</guid>
		<description>Tony, sounds like your machine might have other issues.  Flash Player 10 shouldn&#039;t be slowing your machine down like that.  Are using Firefox as  your browser?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony, sounds like your machine might have other issues.  Flash Player 10 shouldn&#8217;t be slowing your machine down like that.  Are using Firefox as  your browser?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony mooney</title>
		<link>http://blog.pixelfumes.com/?p=213&#038;cpage=1#comment-11214</link>
		<dc:creator>tony mooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 21:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pixelfumes.com/?p=213#comment-11214</guid>
		<description>HI sorry dont really understand all this stuff im kinda new to all this just a quick question i was running flashplayer 9 with no probs untill it said i had to update to 10 now my web browser has slowed down i have to wait 15-20 secs for every new page to open can this be fixed or can i use something other then flashplayer hope you can help in some way
THANKS
Tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI sorry dont really understand all this stuff im kinda new to all this just a quick question i was running flashplayer 9 with no probs untill it said i had to update to 10 now my web browser has slowed down i have to wait 15-20 secs for every new page to open can this be fixed or can i use something other then flashplayer hope you can help in some way<br />
THANKS<br />
Tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomo Atlacatl</title>
		<link>http://blog.pixelfumes.com/?p=213&#038;cpage=1#comment-1627</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomo Atlacatl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 01:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pixelfumes.com/?p=213#comment-1627</guid>
		<description>OMG - Leave it to the &quot;Tweeners&quot; to ruin adobe&#039;s progress........ I think I echo most of everyone&#039;s fears when I say....all it takes is a few tweener sites with a million layers and endless timelines all using the GPU rendering to discredit flash over other techs. I wonder, does M$ poor attempt to compete w/adobe run into similar problems.........wut&#039;s that tech called...&quot;crappylight&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG &#8211; Leave it to the &#8220;Tweeners&#8221; to ruin adobe&#8217;s progress&#8230;&#8230;.. I think I echo most of everyone&#8217;s fears when I say&#8230;.all it takes is a few tweener sites with a million layers and endless timelines all using the GPU rendering to discredit flash over other techs. I wonder, does M$ poor attempt to compete w/adobe run into similar problems&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;wut&#8217;s that tech called&#8230;&#8221;crappylight&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshuacitrak</title>
		<link>http://blog.pixelfumes.com/?p=213&#038;cpage=1#comment-1609</link>
		<dc:creator>joshuacitrak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 23:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pixelfumes.com/?p=213#comment-1609</guid>
		<description>don&#039;t confuse irresponsible devs with newbies who are just getting into flash/programming in general. there really aren&#039;t a lot of academic organizations (SFSU, PSU- my alma) that teach flash programming as it relates to programming overall. flash itself is more accessible than the info on how to write good oop code. flash mentorship is the only solution here, taking new/young programmers at the office under your wing and teaching them best practices and the like. when i was starting out, sure wish i had something like that...
i too, believe the answer to your question is a resounding, &quot;no.&quot; can&#039;t give the benefit of the doubt to a large flash community that is nearly 100% responsible for the backlash it receives from those who complain about its detriment to the interweb from annoying sites/banners/cpu drain...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t confuse irresponsible devs with newbies who are just getting into flash/programming in general. there really aren&#8217;t a lot of academic organizations (SFSU, PSU- my alma) that teach flash programming as it relates to programming overall. flash itself is more accessible than the info on how to write good oop code. flash mentorship is the only solution here, taking new/young programmers at the office under your wing and teaching them best practices and the like. when i was starting out, sure wish i had something like that&#8230;<br />
i too, believe the answer to your question is a resounding, &#8220;no.&#8221; can&#8217;t give the benefit of the doubt to a large flash community that is nearly 100% responsible for the backlash it receives from those who complain about its detriment to the interweb from annoying sites/banners/cpu drain&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Bartow</title>
		<link>http://blog.pixelfumes.com/?p=213&#038;cpage=1#comment-1600</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Bartow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 03:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pixelfumes.com/?p=213#comment-1600</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, I believe the answer to your question is no.  While there are a large number of devs / designers in the &quot;Flash community&quot; who will understand the importance of using the new render modes appropriately, there are many who will not or simply don&#039;t care.  This is a microcosm for the fundamental problem that Adobe has with Flash.  As more features are added to the runtime, more responsibility is given to the developer community.  Because Flash is and has been so accessible, there is a very small barrier to entry, which increases the odds of irresponsible devs being part of the group.  Other technologies don&#039;t necessarily have this problem because getting involved in them is quite an undertaking, which, in most cases, precludes irresponsible devs from getting involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, I believe the answer to your question is no.  While there are a large number of devs / designers in the &#8220;Flash community&#8221; who will understand the importance of using the new render modes appropriately, there are many who will not or simply don&#8217;t care.  This is a microcosm for the fundamental problem that Adobe has with Flash.  As more features are added to the runtime, more responsibility is given to the developer community.  Because Flash is and has been so accessible, there is a very small barrier to entry, which increases the odds of irresponsible devs being part of the group.  Other technologies don&#8217;t necessarily have this problem because getting involved in them is quite an undertaking, which, in most cases, precludes irresponsible devs from getting involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.pixelfumes.com/?p=213&#038;cpage=1#comment-1593</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 03:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pixelfumes.com/?p=213#comment-1593</guid>
		<description>Delizade, you can get the RSS here: http://kaourantin.net/rss.xml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delizade, you can get the RSS here: <a href="http://kaourantin.net/rss.xml" rel="nofollow">http://kaourantin.net/rss.xml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: delizade</title>
		<link>http://blog.pixelfumes.com/?p=213&#038;cpage=1#comment-1584</link>
		<dc:creator>delizade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 14:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pixelfumes.com/?p=213#comment-1584</guid>
		<description>thanx for news. i met that site - Kaourantin.net - thanx to you but i could not find RSS feeed link. is there ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanx for news. i met that site &#8211; Kaourantin.net &#8211; thanx to you but i could not find RSS feeed link. is there ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paulius Uza</title>
		<link>http://blog.pixelfumes.com/?p=213&#038;cpage=1#comment-1578</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulius Uza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 10:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pixelfumes.com/?p=213#comment-1578</guid>
		<description>Well, the good thing is that you cannot simply publish your swf content in GPU mode, it&#039;s up to the banner host script to decide if the loaded content will be GPU enabled or not. I doubt that Ad providers will be that dumb to clog their entire host ecosystem down just from curiosity.

As from independent developers - unfortunately there is too little information to prevent such thing from happening, most of them will put the GPU/DIRECT tags blindly. 

This is the first place I got such important FP10 performance related information (Adobe, get a clue), thanks (Tinic too :)).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the good thing is that you cannot simply publish your swf content in GPU mode, it&#8217;s up to the banner host script to decide if the loaded content will be GPU enabled or not. I doubt that Ad providers will be that dumb to clog their entire host ecosystem down just from curiosity.</p>
<p>As from independent developers &#8211; unfortunately there is too little information to prevent such thing from happening, most of them will put the GPU/DIRECT tags blindly. </p>
<p>This is the first place I got such important FP10 performance related information (Adobe, get a clue), thanks (Tinic too <img src='http://blog.pixelfumes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
